Marital Agreement Cases in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County
Appellate Cases Involving Antenuptial And Postnuptial Agreements
- Stackhouse v. Zaretsky – Pennsylvania Superior Court discusses validity of antenuptial and postnuptial agreements and the impact upon husband and wife’s ante nuptial and post nuptial agreements.
- Sirio v. Sirio – The PA Superior Court reviewed case involving high-income Melzer analysis for child support. PA Superior Court held that the Hearing Officer should have considered the mother’s counsel fee request 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 4351 which allows awarded of counsel fees to the plaintiff in a support action. The award of counsel fees because of Father’s obdurate, vexatious or dilatory behavior pursuant to section 2503 does not prevent an award of additional counsel fees under section 4351.
- Krebs v. Krebs – The Superior Court held that mother was entitled to retroactive modification of the child support order beyond the period that she had a petition for modification filed because father failed in his affirmative duty to report to the court his increase in earnings. The Court also explained that an award of attorney’s fees to a plaintiff in a support action may be appropriate in certain circumstances and that the court should consider (1) whether the obligor’s unreasonable or obstreperous conduct impeded the determination of an appropriate support order; (2) whether the obligor mounted a fair and reasonable defense in a child support order; (3) whether the obligor’s failure to fulfill his moral and financial obligation to support his children required legal action to force him to accept his responsibilities; and (4) whether the financial positions and financial needs of the parties are disparate.
- Faust v. Walker – The PA Superior Court held that the domestic relations section is granted the power to issue orders to secure assets to satisfy support obligations and arrearages by intercepting or seizing judgments or settlements.
- Annechino v. Joire – Wife claimed that since the parties’ marriage settlement agreement was not incorporated into the parties’ Divorce Decree and the pleadings did not include a count for equitable distribution, the trial court did not have the authority to enforce the Property Settlement Agreement and the husband’s only remedy is a separate civil action in equity. The Superior Court held that section 3105(a) of the Divorce Code controls which permits any agreement entered related to the divorce action to be enforced by the family courts.
- Hopkins v. Byes – The PA Superior Court held that the trial court did not err or abuse its discretion by imposing $500 attorney’s fees as a sanction for the mother’s failure to abide by a custody order, without first ascertaining mother’s ability to pay the sanction.
- Crispo v. Crispo – Postnuptial agreements or marriage settlement agreements are continuing contract where the duties of the parties are ongoing and the statute of limitations generally does not run. Crispo v. Crispo, 2006 Pa. Super 267.
NOTE: The cases listed are for informational purposes only and may have been amended or overturned by subsequently decided court cases.
-
“Melissa was able to help”
- Rhonda -
“I not only recommend attorney Melissa Lewis, but I guarantee once you have used her service you will look no further. She responds in an extreme timely matter, is very knowledgeable, and an extremely trustworthy person.”
- Maurice B. -
“Amazing”
- Barbara
Taybron Law Firm, LLC Is the Right Choice for Your Family Matters
Learn more about our firm and why you should entrust our experienced legal team to handle your family law matters.
-
Supporting Active Military and VeteransOffering Free 30-Minute Consultations to Active Military and Veterans.
-
Experienced
More than 30 years of combined experience practicing family law in Pennsylvania.
-
Diverse
Attorney Melissa C. Taybron is trained as a Certified Mediator.
-
Complex CasesExperienced with high income, self employed professionals in complex support and equitable distribution cases.
-
Strong SupportA team of senior attorneys, junior associates, paralegals and law school clerks for full legal support throughout the process.
-
Notary Services
We now offer mobile notary services per your request.
Request a Consultation
We can further discuss the individual details of your case when you come in for your no-obligation consultation, which can be scheduled by calling our firm at (412) 231-9786 or via the quick contact form we have included at the bottom of this page.